Alcohol Treatment and Alcoholism Advice

 
 
 
 

SPECIALIST PHARMACOLOGICAL & BIOCHEMICAL INTERVENTIONS

SPECIALIST OPIATE DETOXIFICATION TECHNIQUES

There are two main objectives of specialist opiate detoxification techniques: to reduce the duration of detoxification whilst minimising discomfort to the patient and to induct the patient onto naltrexone at the earliest possible opportunity. It is hypothesised that the combination of these factors will enhance both patient up-take and the immediate and longer term outcomes of detoxification. The various techniques vary in their use of either a general anaesthetic or heavy sedation, and in the timing of opiate-antagonist administration. Specialist services should provide access to some forms of rapid opiate detoxification for selected cases.

ULTRA-RAPID OPIATE DETOXIFICATION

Ultra-rapid detoxification is an umbrella term that has come to represent a new treatment approach specifically designed to detoxify patients within hours rather than days and to almost completely eliminate the subjective discomfort of withdrawal symptoms. These factors lead directly to enhanced up-take of detoxification by clients and a more rapid induction onto naltrexone than can be achieved with traditional detoxification. The essential components of this technique are the administration of large doses of opiate antagonists (naloxone, naltrexone or nalmefene) leading to rapid reversal of opiate receptor down-regulation, together with a general anaesthetic. Naloxone is the most commonly used antagonist for this purpose (with or without naltrexone in addition), and naltrexone is continued orally following completion of the detoxification to prevent relapse. Adjunctive medication is used to control various withdrawal symptoms including metoclopramide for vomiting, ranitidine as a gastro-protectant and octreotide as an anti-diarrhoeal. Detoxification using such techniques may be completed within as little as 4 to 6 hours, allowing employed patients to return to work the following day, and can usually be performed on a day-patient basis.

The major risk associated with ultra-rapid detoxification is the risk associated with administration of a general anaesthetic. The risk of death having received a general anaesthetic for any purpose is in the region of 1 in 250,000 and of adverse events 1 in 10,000 (D'Ambra, 1998). However, the mortality rate may be as high as 1 in 1000 for the ultra-rapid detoxification procedures which have been carried out world-wide to date. The risk of adverse events in this client population may be increased by the increased prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in habitual opiate users. There are also two case reports indicating a possible risk of cardiovascular morbidity in patients receiving high dose naloxone under general anaesthetic (Taft R, 1983) (Andree M, 1980). All clients should be assessed by an anaesthetist before acceptance for treatment, and those with evidence of cardiovascular, thyroid or hepatic dysfunction will usually be excluded.

RAPID OPIATE DETOXIFICATION

Rapid detoxification also involves the use of naloxone and/or naltrexone to speed the withdrawal process. In contrast to ultra-rapid detoxification a general anaesthetic is not used; rather the discomfort of withdrawal is ameliorated by the use of a central adrenergic agonist (usually clonidine) and generous doses of sedative medication (usually benzodiazepines) rather than anaesthesia. Doses of opiate antagonist are smaller than those used in ultra-rapid detoxification, and the duration of detoxification varies from between 2 and 12 days, depending on the particular protocol used (O'Connor & Kosten, 1998). The use of heavy sedation is usually considered to require admission to a high dependency unit (risk of accidental self-injury and aspiration of vomitus), although some regimes have been designed to limit the amount of sedation required, even to the extent of the procedure occurring on a daypatient basis (see below).

A recent Italian study (Gerra et al, 2000) compared three forms of day-patient detoxification. Patients were randomised to one of three groups which received either a standard methadone detoxification over 10 days, a standard adrenergic agonist detoxification for 5 days or a rapid opiate detoxification over 2 days. The rapid technique appeared to have various advantages.

  • Withdrawal symptoms were much more severe and prolonged in the methadone treated group as compared to the other two groups.
  • Both negative and positive craving scores were much more severe and prolonged in the methadone treated group as compared to the other two groups.
  • Mood was significantly lowered after detoxification in the methadone treated group as compared to the other two groups, although this difference resolved within weeks.
  • Use of heroin was significantly lower during detoxification in the rapid detox group as compared to the other two groups.
  • Acceptance and commencement of postdetoxification naltrexone therapy (75% of subjects) was significantly greater in the rapid detoxification group than in the other two groups.
  • Relapse to heroin dependence at 6 months was significantly lower in those that initially accepted naltrexone therapy than those who refused it.

NALTREXONE COMPRESSED OPIATE DETOXIFICATION (NCOD)

A well-known current example of this procedure in the UK is carried out in the Detox 5 group of centres. The regime differs from rapid detoxification in that adrenergic agonists are not routinely used, sedation levels are lower and naltrexone is administered for the first time on day 4 of the 5 day detoxification period.

  • Specialist services should provide access to 'Naltrexone-compressed opiate detoxification' (NCOD) for selected cases.
  • The major indication for NCOD is previous failure to complete in-patient detoxification due to low tolerance of discomfort.
  • Ultra-rapid detoxification (using general anaesthetic) remains an experimental technique which may be associated with an unacceptably high mortality rate in its current form. Access should NOT be provided to ultra-rapid detoxification by specialist services.

As such, naltrexone is being used only partially to speed the process of detoxification at a point when most exogenous opiates will already have cleared spontaneously from the body. Detoxification from day 1 to 5 is managed by the prescription of a moderate level of sedation (titration of sedative medication to maintain Glasgow Coma Scale at 13/15), and by the use of adjunctive medication to control vomiting, diarrhoea, and colic. Trazadone is used to aid night sedation, and continued with naltrexone for up to one year following completion of detoxification. Immediate completion rates and longer-term outcomes were all demonstrated to be impressive in a study by Beani et al (2000), with 98% of patients completing the procedure and abstinence rates of 71%, 61% and 51% at 3, 6 and 12 months respectively.

THE PLACE OF SPECIALIST DETOXIFICATION TECHNIQUES IN CURRENT PRACTICE

There appear to have been approximately 15 deaths related to the occurrence of approximately 15,000 procedures world-wide. The large majority of these have been associated with ultra-rapid detoxification and have probably occurred as a result of cardiac arrythmias or myocardial infarction caused by the general anaesthetic. Several deaths have followed rapid detoxification (no general anaesthetic) and two of these were probably due to gastro-intestinal complications such as acute bleeding and diarrhoea-related dehydration. There are no known deaths which have followed the naltrexone compressed detoxification technique. In conclusion, despite all the evident advantages of the technique, ultra-rapid detoxification clearly remains an experimental intervention.

With regard to rapid detoxification, a Cochrane Review of some of these studies (Gowing et al, 2000/2001) summarises as follows:'. it seems that compared to withdrawal managed by clonidine alone, the severity of withdrawal induced by a combination of naltrexone and clonidine is at least similar and is probably more severe for one to two days following initial administration of naltrexone. Indeed some studies found significant numbers of subjects experiencing delirium following early naltrexone administration, and vomiting and diarrhoea more common than with clonidine-only regimes. To manage such side-effects it is desirable to provide a high level of monitoring and support for several hours following administration of the first dose of opioid antagonist.'This increase in severity of the withdrawal syndrome is however at least partially offset by a probable effect on completion rates, with these being greater for the combination regimes than for clonidine alone. The review (Gowing et al, 2000/2001) continues: '.this can only be considered clearly the case for withdrawal from heroin, rather than from methadone. However the number of studies performed to date is small, and the magnitude of the difference uncertain. Methadone-dependent patients commenced on such a regime should be informed of the experimental nature of the regime.' A study by workers at the Institute of Psychiatry (Buntwal et al, 2000) examined a lofexidine/naltrexone combination regime with very satisfactory results for both methadone and heroin detoxification. Buntwal et al found that withdrawal symptoms were no more severe, even initially, in the naltrexone/lofexidine combination group than in a lofexidine alone group. They thought this may have been due to the ability to commence the detoxification with high doses of lofexidine, whereas the studies using clonidine started with low doses due to its propensity for hypotensive effects. The overall mean level of discomfort was less for the combination group. Additionally, the withdrawal syndrome resolved more rapidly for the combination group, dropping to low levels by day 6, whereas a similar level was only maintained after day 12 in the lofexidine only group.

Naltrexone compressed detoxification as performed at 'Detox 5' appears to be an acceptable intervention, where the potential benefits outweigh the risks, especially in selected cases where previous failure has occurred due to an inability to tolerate discomfort. Having said this, there have been no randomised controlled trials published examining the procedure, and as such it is still regarded by some as an experimental technique.

CONCLUSION

All techniques remain experimental to some extent, and there is probably an unacceptably high mortality rate with the general anaesthetic ultra-rapid techniques as they are currently practiced. The naltrexone compressed regime appears to have a low mortality rate, a limited duration of admission (5 days) and impressively high completion rates. As such it should find a place in current practice for selected clients who have failed in conventional detoxification due to low tolerance of discomfort, and those with employment commitments.




Next page .. SPECIALIST COMMUNITY PRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS

Alcohol Guidelines index



The above information is copyright of Dr Bruce Trathen MBBS MRCPsych (2006). ISBN 0-9545164-0-0. The author grants permission for these guidelines to be downloaded, copied and distributed freely, but does not grant permission for their sale.


Why DryOutNow.com

Alcohol Rehabilitation Centres

DryOutNow.com have the longest track record of addictions treatment provision in the UK using the Internet as a contact medium.

Staffed by doctors and other healthcare professionals committed and obliged to provide you with ethical advice.

Advice and treatment planning from high-level addiction specialists - consultant doctors, leading addiction nurses and counsellors.

Working with the counsellors and treatment centres that achieve the best recovery rates.

Get the right help for yourself or other now by calling 0845 370 0203


Alcoholism Services

10 Harley Street

Arrange immediate access to residential treatment for alcoholism in any area of the UK.
Dial 0845 370 0203.


Alcoholism
Alcohol Help and
Alcohol Treatment

Call 0845 370 0203 Now

© DryOutNow.com   |   Press & Media   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Sitemap   |   website maintenance